Should a portion of the blame for our housing shortage be placed upon sales managers?

In an environment which is accompanied by elevated interest rates, hopeful home buyers are challenged by housing affordability (or a lack thereof). But the real problem is not found in interest rates. The real problem is found in inflation. Housing inflation, to be more specific.

Housing inflation, linked to the fact that, we just don’t build (or rehab) enough homes. Every year. Year after year. Same problem. So, in real estate, is it wise to simply recruit more salespeople to follow the same business model? To attain the same outcome?

What is the real sales challenge to solve? Add more homes to the market. Every year. Year after year. Meet demand.

A noted portion of homes which could be/should be added to the market each year will come through, 1) rehabbing more homes, and 2) building more new homes.

An industrywide over-reliance which is placed upon selling move-in ready homes, coupled to a lack of prioritization – and/or specialization – in creating additional housing stock is arguably a “sales management C-minus,” or a “sales management D.”

Don’t blame Jerome Powell. Our housing challenge is, in many ways, about sales management deficiencies. A lack of leadership in sales. Which, in my opinion, functions as one primary contributor to our ongoing national housing challenge. Inefficient sales management in real estate makes Jerome Powell’s tough job even tougher.

Creating more inventory is the solution. Ignoring processes which will lead to the creation of more inventory further contributes to housing inflation. To fewer sales. To less commission. And, quite possibly, to the underutilization of capable real estate professionals.

Real Estate and AI

One does not really sell a home. So then can one really, effectively push for a deal to close? Yes. And, no.

People really kinda’ buy homes. So pulling a buyer in, to a great experience offered to that buyer – an experience which “stars the home” so to speak – could be an effective approach to consider. Then engaging your buyer in an interactive way. Rather than selling a home to a buyer. Ideas and approaches. Aligned with the effective use of AI. In real estate.

By observing data, and in this form, “data” could be consumer behavior, then by thinking through responses to observed data, a real estate professional could craft their own foundational buyer-inquiry follow-up system. In this manner, AI could facilitate added value for the real estate professional. In their market. For buyers. And as such, for sellers too.

With an emphasis placed upon the buyer’s experience. Adding to a value-add the real estate professional delivers. By facilitating an interactive experience for the buyer. Less of a need to push deals. More so, the focus having been transitioned to, pulling buyers in through a great virtual experience. Delivered by the Realtor.

Data…Feedback…Response.